Researched Antidetect Score

Hello friend. We have been working with multi-accounting for a long time and know how critical it is to use high-quality antidetect browsers. That is why we developed our own rating system — Researched Antidetect Score.

We developed this system in collaboration with 40+ anonymity experts. After dozens of iterations and improvements, Researched Antidetect Score has become an accurate and practical tool.

Below you can find the criteria we use to evaluate the quality of antidetect browsers.

Assessment Criteria

1. Anonymity

We check via ipqualityscore.com. It evaluates IP reliability by dozens of parameters.

• ≥80% — 10 pts
• ≥50% — 5 pts
• Lower — 0 pts

2. Fingerprint Popularity

We check the popularity of the browser fingerprint. A natural fingerprint should be popular enough but not too unique.

• 0.01% – 2% — 10 pts (natural fingerprint)
• Other — 0 pts

3. Timezone Spoofing

• "Good" (correct spoofing) — 10 pts
• Otherwise — 0 pts

4. OS Masking

• "Correct" — 10 pts
• "No" (partially visible real OS) — 5 pts
• Other — 0 pts

5. Script Check

• ≥9 checks passed — 10 pts
• ≥8 — 3 pts
• ≥5 — 2 pts
• Less — 0 pts

6. Difference between 2 profiles

• Different (answer "Yes") — 10 pts
• Same — 0 pts

7. Cloudflare Challenge

• "Pass" — 10 pts
• "Challenge" — 5 pts
• "Bad" — 0 pts

8. PixelScan.net Score

• 0 flags — 10 pts
• 1 flag — 6 pts
• 2 flags — 3 pts
• 3 flags — 1 pt
• >3 — 0 pts

9. fv.pro Score

• 0 red flags — 10 pts
• 1 flag — 6 pts
• 2 flags — 3 pts
• 3 flags — 1 pt
• >3 flags — 0 pts

Recommendation

RSScoreAntidetect.recommendation_text

RSScoreAntidetect.recommendation_price

Go to comparison table